So a family in Canada has decided to keep their baby's gender a secret from the wider world, with only the parents, the siblings and a few other people.
Here's the rationale from the mother that has inflamed experts and other observers: "We decided not to share Storm's sex for now -- a tribute to freedom and choice in place of limitation, a standup to what the world could become in Storm's lifetime."
Hmm. Not sharing the baby's gender "for now". What is so damaging about that, I wonder? The family hasn't tried to surgically make the baby genderless. They are simply trying to raise it outside the preconceived notions of gender determinism.
The vitriolic response reveals just how threatened people feel when someone gets out of the box, so to speak, with gender and with parenting.
Continue reading "The 'genderless' baby controversy: Really? " »